SASA ENDORSES PSIRA HIGH-LEVEL ENQUIRY
April 22, 2013
In the reported assault, a 56-year-old woman, Esther Mankge, was taken to a back room at the store and beaten with a belt and rubber hammer allegedly by five security guards who had accused her of stealing a packet of undergarments from the CB clothing store.
The attack took place in October last year and was caught on camera. It recently emerged on the Internet, went viral and led to the arrest of the alleged assailants in early April.
Two of the accused were released on R500 bail each while the other three were remanded in custody because of previous assault charges.
The security officers posted at the store were company staff members, according to CB stores’ management. Irregardless of whether a security officer is employed by a security company or is an in-house security officer for company the rules regarding background checks and PSIRA clearance is essential. People with criminal records are not allowed to be security officers.
“This underlines the critical importance of background checks on job-seeking applicants before they are taken into the company’s workforce,” says Ms Reid. “Recent statistics show an increase of attempts by job applicants in the security industry to falsify qualifications and such certification as driving licences and education levels achieved.
One national screening company with clients in the security industry reported an increase in falsified and invalid certification across the board compared to the same period (1st January to end March) last year.
According to PSIRA, between 15 000 and 20 000 new members join the private security industry each month. However, not all companies and private security guards register with PSIRA as required by law. Many companies and security guards attempt to operate unlawfully under the radar.
“Unemployment is chronic,” says Ms Reid, “and applicants are willing to risk lying on their job applications to get work. We urge our members to screen each and every potential employee and the continue with interim screening during the employment period of the officer”.
Ms Reid stresses the importance of security companies, or companies with an in-house security complement, to be members of SASA and to be compliant with the prerequisites of the Private Security Industry Regulatory Authority (PSIRA). It makes it far easier for a procurement department when hiring a security company to ensure that they are SASA members because they are then removed from the liability of hiring a non-compliant security company.
“This carries weight,” she says. “As members of SASA, employees of security companies are registered and are bound by the association’s and PSIRA’s code of conduct. They are also subject to the organisation’s strict code of discipline and violation penalties. We urge our members to take SASA’s gold option for maximum protection.”
The private security industry is regulated by the PSIRA Act which makes provision for a disciplinary process, including the suspension and withdrawal of the registration of those found guilty of misconduct.
Moves are afoot to further regulate the private security industry with an overhaul of the PSIRA Act. The Private Security Industry Regulation Act Amendment Bill is being redrafted and is expected to be ready for its first reading later this year. Amongst other issues the new legislation addresses security threats, risks and problems regarding the regulation of the private security industry. The amendments also provide for “the role of the private security industry regulatory authority in promoting crime prevention partnerships with state entities”.
(ends – 580 words)